Description
- Publisher : Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 1/E, 2024 edition (21 February 2024); 011-43574357
- Language : English
- Paperback : 198 pages
- ISBN-10 : 9356967806
- ISBN-13 : 978-9356967809
- Item Weight : 260 g
- Dimensions : 16 x 1.02 x 24.13 cm
- Country of Origin : India
- Packer : JAYPEE BROTHERS MEDICAL PUBLISHERS PVT.LTD
Saraswati –
Easy to read and understand, making the daunting task of scientific publishing seem less scary. A great resource for beginner researchers.
Kashish Jain –
An informative and accessible guide. It’s well-written and easy to follow. Definitely recommended for anyone new to academic publishing.
Nishita Mathur –
Clear, easy to understand, and very practical for early career researchers. It helped me overcome my fear of submitting my first paper.
Aastha Sinha –
Provides a solid foundation. Nandini Chatterjee covers essential points efficiently. I found it useful during my masters.
Mannvit Sisodiya –
The self-assessment tools are a great addition. However, I wish there was more detail on specific journal requirements. Still, recommended.
Sushant –
I appreciated the straightforward language. It made a complex topic more accessible. Some sections could be expanded, but it’s helpful.
Deepesh Pandey –
A decent overview, but I felt it lacked depth in certain areas, such as dealing with rejection. Good for a quick read, nonetheless.
Jahnvi Singh –
The book helped me avoid some common pitfalls in scientific writing. Worth the investment for the insights on publication ethics alone.
Nisu Kumari –
It’s a good introductory book, although more experienced researchers might not find it as valuable. Perfect for undergraduates.
Naman Pamnani –
As a novice, I found this book incredibly useful! It demystified the publication process. My rating is based on its clarity and directness.
Debesh Misra –
I found the book helpful in understanding the publication process, but there are other publication guides that offer more comprehensive advice.
Vishal Baisoya –
A concise guide for beginners. The ethics section was particularly helpful. Some parts felt a bit repetitive, though. Overall, a good starting point.