Description
- ISBN-13: 9788124608265
- Publisher: D.K. Printworld
- Binding: Hardback
- Language: Hindi
- ISBN-10: 8124608261
- Publisher Date: 2015
- Edition: 1
- No of Pages: 240
Original price was: ₹650.00.₹488.00Current price is: ₹488.00.
Discover the radical philosophy of Charvaka in Tattvopaplavasinghah by Kashinath Naiupane. This Hindi translation of Jairashi Bhatta’s work explores Brihaspati’s tradition, offering a skeptical deconstruction of major Indian philosophical systems. ISBN: 9788124608265. Explore the Charvaka ideology and its annihilation of established principles.
Out of stock
Weight | 0.5 kg |
---|
Abdul Qadir –
Engaging and insightful! It sheds light on a unique philosophical perspective. Very well-written and thought-provoking.
Atul Keshri –
A fantastic resource for understanding Charvaka philosophy. The author presents the material in a clear, concise manner. Highly recommended!
Ankit Deore –
This book is a gem! It offers a critical analysis of traditional Indian thought. It opened my mind to new possibilities. I’m very satisfied with it.
Tanisha –
A challenging read! It definitely makes you think, but the language was dense at times. Some concepts were hard to grasp without prior knowledge. Overall, an interesting but demanding book.
Ayush Kanojia –
I found this book to be challenging but ultimately rewarding. The ideas presented are complex. It requires careful reading and reflection.
Aaditya Gupta –
Excellent exploration of a lesser-known philosophical school! Naiupane’s work brings clarity to complex ideas. Highly recommend for anyone interested in Indian philosophy.
Yogesh –
A mixed bag. Some chapters were fascinating. Others were dense and impenetrable. It requires a dedicated reader to fully appreciate it.
Kiran Sudhakar More –
While informative, it feels like a translation. The essence felt somewhat diluted. I expected more.
Nipun Mehrotra –
A solid introduction to Charvaka philosophy. It provides a good overview of the main concepts. The book could be more accessible, though.
Sahil Saini –
I appreciated the introduction to Charvaka philosophy. The translation seemed well done. However, I wished there were more contextual explanations. Worth reading for philosophy enthusiasts.
Gautam Vyas –
A thought-provoking exploration of Charvaka’s radical ideas. It provides a valuable counterpoint to mainstream philosophies. Could be more accessible, though.
Vishal Teotia –
This book exceeded my expectations. It’s a brilliant exploration of Charvaka philosophy. I learned a great deal. I highly recommend it to others.
Nitin Yadav –
An essential text for anyone interested in Indian philosophy. It provides a comprehensive overview of Charvaka thought. It is well written and informative.
Amit Yadav –
The book is important. It’s also quite difficult to get through. The philosophical jargon can be overwhelming. I would recommend it with reservations.
Kalpana Prasad –
The content is interesting. The writing is dry. I struggled to stay engaged. It may be better suited for academic study than casual reading.
Mukul Singh –
I was intrigued by the concept but struggled with the execution. The translation is adequate. It requires patience and multiple readings.
Jacob George –
I had high hopes, but I was disappointed. The book felt repetitive at times. Some arguments seemed weak. It could use a more rigorous approach.
Tanisha Gupta –
Found this book to be both enlightening and frustrating. The content is fascinating, but the writing style is somewhat academic. A mixed experience overall.
Rashika Na –
This book is a revelation. It challenges conventional wisdom and offers a fresh perspective on reality. A must-read for anyone seeking truth.
Akshita Bhardwaj –
Deeply philosophical! A bit too advanced for my understanding initially, but I persevered and enjoyed the challenge.
Karishma Kumari –
A must-read for serious students of philosophy. The book presents a unique perspective. The arguments are razor-sharp. It may not be for casual readers.
Gagandeep Singh –
This book is a deep dive into skepticism. While I found the arguments compelling, the structure felt a bit disorganized. It could use better editing to improve readability.
Abhinav Srivastava –
It’s dense. It’s definitely for serious philosophy enthusiasts. I found it a bit overwhelming, to be honest.