Description
- ISBN-13: 9780367488628
- Publisher: Routledge (Manohar)
- Height: 47 mm
- Weight: 1000 gr
- ISBN-10: 0367488620
- Binding: Paperback
- Language: English
- Width: 56 mm
Original price was: ₹895.00.₹680.00Current price is: ₹680.00.
“Explore the messy world of social science research with ‘After Method.’ John Law challenges traditional research methods, arguing for an approach that embraces fluidity and complexity. Discover how methods shape reality and the political implications of knowledge creation. 9780367488628”
5 in stock
Weight | 0.5 kg |
---|
Prajwal Ravishankar Bharad –
A challenging but rewarding read. ‘After Method’ pushes you to question everything you thought you knew about social science research. Not for the faint of heart, but highly recommended.
Jayesh –
Interesting concepts, but ‘After Method’ felt a bit too abstract at times. Law makes a compelling case for rethinking research, but the practical applications could be clearer. Still, a thought-provoking read.
Kanwar Devaansh Singh –
A powerful critique of traditional social science. ‘After Method’ opened my eyes to new ways of thinking about research. It will revolutionize how you view reality.
Chaitanya –
‘After Method’ has some good points, but the writing style is quite dense. Some paragraph felt like a wall of text. I struggled to get through it, honestly. Not easy.
Athira Venugopal –
‘After Method’ is a game-changer! Law’s perspective is refreshing and vital. A must-read for anyone interested in social science research. It’s quite difficult to read though.
Aditi Jiwani –
I appreciate Law’s attempt to shake up traditional methods, but ‘After Method’ felt a bit too theoretical for my taste. It’s like, can we get real for a moment?
Arun Kumar Singh –
Law’s ideas are fascinating, and he definitely makes you think. However, ‘After Method’ is dense and can be difficult to follow. I wish there were more real-world examples.
Devanshu –
A brilliant and insightful book. ‘After Method’ challenges conventional wisdom and offers a new vision for social science research. Some of the book’s arguments were not very convincing